{"workflow":["Compose another workflow (spec 14) · a STATIC target: a filesystem path OR registry:owner/name@version (pinned). A templated target is refused at check (NIKA-COMP-001). Exactly one of tool: | workflow: (the invoke tagged union · G21)."]}

the language

workflow

Compose another workflow (spec 14) · a STATIC target: a filesystem path OR registry:owner/name@version (pinned). A templated target is refused at check (NIKA-COMP-001). Exactly one of tool: | workflow: (the invoke tagged union · G21). One of 59 words the served contract declares, projected from workflow.schema.json, the same file your editor validates against.

1surfaceinvoke
optionaleverywherea choice, never a miss
stringtypethe declared shape
schemathe sourcenever prose

the contract

1 declaration

Descriptions are the schema's own; the deeper invariants (value languages and regexes) ride the same projection. A miss is a nika check finding before anything runs.

invoke: stringCompose another workflow (spec 14) · a STATIC target: a filesystem path OR registry:owner/name@version (pinned). A templated target is refused at check (NIKA-COMP-001). Exactly one of tool: | workflow: (the invoke tagged union · G21).inside invoke:

in a real file

No gated source on this site speaks workflow yet. The contract above is the reference, and the register never invents evidence. Try it in the playground: nika check teaches the shape.

cross-references

the check gates that name it

where it lives

accepted by

invoke

[]

defined by

02-verbs

the block it lives in

invoke: inside invoke:

The whole grammar in one place: the four verbs · the standard library · the spec. Try it in the playground. Read the reference →