Variables

04 · Variables #

Nika uses one substitution syntax everywhere · ${{ ... }} · matching GitHub Actions. Inside strings · inside object values · inside array elements · inside conditions. One syntax · one mental model.

The one syntax · `${{ ... }}` #

1# Inside a string2prompt: "Summarize · ${{ inputs.topic }}"3​4# Inside a value position5with:6  data: ${{ tasks.research.output }}7​8# Inside a condition (local namespaces · [03 §when](./03-dag.md))9when: ${{ with.coverage > 80 }}10​11# Inside an array12tools:13  - ${{ const.tool_a }}14  - ${{ const.tool_b }}

If you have used GitHub Actions, this is the same. If you have not, the rule is simple · anywhere you want a value resolved at task dispatch time, wrap it in `${{ }}`.

What's inside `${{ }}` is [CEL](https://cel.dev) (Common Expression Language · the validated, non-Turing-complete standard used by Kubernetes, Envoy, and gRPC). A bare reference like ${{ inputs.topic }} is a CEL identifier path that evaluates to its value; a condition like ${{ with.coverage > 80 }} is a CEL boolean. One expression language, everywhere: Nika does not invent a DSL. See 03-dag.md for the v0.1 CEL subset.

The 5 namespaces #

1${{ inputs.X }}            typed workflow input          (declared in envelope `inputs:` · supplied by the caller at launch, or by its own `default:`)2${{ const.X }}             named constant                 (declared in envelope `const:` · a fixed value baked into the workflow)3${{ secrets.X }}           masked secret reference        (vault-backed · never in logs)4${{ with.X }}              task-level scope               (declared per-task `with:` block · the bindings ARE the data edges)5${{ tasks.X.output }}      task record reference          (or .status · .error · .duration_ms · the CLOSED projection set · BOUNDARY surfaces only — see below)

Five namespaces. That's it.

The first three — inputs · const · secrets — are the value authorities, the closed family every workflow value is declared under (LAW-SURFACE-0201 · one authority, one spelling, no alias). with and tasks are the runtime namespaces (task-scope bindings and settled task records) — legal in ${{ }}, never value authorities.

⚰️ `config` was the fourth, and it is dead (2026-08-12). Measured: zero usage in real work; its default: was its only possible source (nothing outside the file could supply it — --var reaches inputs: only); and under the taint lattice ${{ config.p }} and ${{ inputs.p }} produced the same NIKA-AUTH-008 by the same taint path — indiscernible. The cell it occupied (nobody supplies it × treated as untrusted) was a constant the checker was being asked to treat as hostile. A deployment knob is now an inputs: entry with required: false and a default:. A ${{ config.X }} read refuses NIKA-VALUES-003, which teaches the three-authority family.

Dead forms (refused with a classification teaching · the E-split). The pre-flip vars: and env: envelope fields are dead: a vars: block refuses with NIKA-VALUES-001, an env: block with NIKA-VALUES-002, and a ${{ vars.X }} / ${{ env.X }} read with the same codes. Each old use classifies into the authority its role commands — a typed parameter is an inputs: declaration, a fixed value a const: entry, non-sensitive runtime configuration an inputs: declaration with required: false and a default:, a governed store reference a secrets: entry (classify-not-rename · never a bulk rename). A value-namespace read outside the three-authority family (${{ params.X }} and friends) refuses with NIKA-VALUES-003.

The reference boundary · where `tasks.*` may appear #

Since W2 « the flow », the tasks namespace is boundary-only. A ${{ tasks.X.* }} reference is legal in exactly five places ·

• surface · why it is a boundary · graph effect
• `with:` values · the binding imports the data — **the binding IS the edge** · one typed edge per reference ([03 §with](./03-dag.md))
• `with:` values, plural · `${{ group.<name> }}` · the fan-in fold imports a whole declared set — **this is the ONLY door it has**, tighter than `tasks.*` · one `fan-in` edge per declared member ([03 §group](./03-dag.md#group--optional--fan-in-membership--the-plural-of-a-data-edge))
• `after:` keys · the entry names the producer · one control edge per entry
• `on_error.recover:` · a fallback reads a settled record · a recovery edge (parking · `NIKA-DAG-004`)
• an `unwind` task body · cleanup reads the **producer it unwinds** — the ONLY legal target there (a sibling may still be running · the read would race) · none (the E_f attachment never enters `G_p`)
• workflow `outputs:` · the run's exports read the settled world · none (everything is terminal at read time)

Everywhere else — verb fields (`prompt:` · `command:` · `args:` · …), `when:`, `for_each:` — a `tasks.*` reference is refused at parse time (NIKA-VAR-021 · validation_error) with a machine-applicable fix: hoist it into `with:` and read the binding ·

1# ❌ NIKA-VAR-021 — the body reads the global namespace2summarize:3    ◇infer:4      prompt: "Summarize · ${{ tasks.fetch.output }}"5​6# ✅ the fix `nika check --fix` applies7summarize:8    with:9      article: ${{ tasks.fetch.output }}10    ◇infer:11      prompt: "Summarize · ${{ with.article }}"

The task body is a pure function of its declared inputs (with · the three value authorities inputs · const · secrets · the loop locals): every cross-task dependency is visible at the boundary, named, and typed by its edge role. Nothing else reads another task.

Bare `tasks.X` is not a value (normative · D2 · #75). The task result is a record; its observable projections are the CLOSED set .output (the value) · .status (terminal enum) · .error · .duration_ms — additions are a spec minor. An UNPROJECTED ${{ tasks.X }} in any value position is a validation_error (NIKA-VAR · « the envelope is not a value — pick .output »): before 0.103 it silently denoted the whole envelope, the source of the golden-drift trap engine#524 had to teach around. No aliases — one meaning per spelling.

`group.<name>` is not a namespace either. It is the plural reader of `tasks` — same runtime family, one door instead of five (a with: value · everywhere else is NIKA-VAR-021). It denotes a set of task records, so it belongs beside tasks rather than beside the three value authorities, and the count below is unchanged. See 03 §group for the record shape and the fan-in pass-set.

Loop-locals are not a namespace. Inside a for_each task body, two extra identifiers are in scope: ${{ item }} (the current element) and ${{ index }} (its 0-based position). They are loop-scoped locals, alive only within that task's body, not global namespaces. So the count stays « 5 namespaces » + the for-each locals where a loop is present.

Shadowing is structurally impossible. Every namespace is reached through its explicit prefix (inputs. · const. · secrets. · with. · tasks.): an inputs.item and the loop-local item never collide (one is inputs.item · the other is bare item), a task may be named item (tasks.item.output is unambiguous), and with.X never hides an inputs.X. The only bare identifiers in the language are the two loop-locals, and for_each does not nest within a task, so there is no scope chain · no resolution-order subtleties · nothing to shadow. This is by construction, not by rule.

`${{ inputs.X }}` · typed workflow inputs #

Declared once in the envelope · immutable across the workflow run · every entry is a typed declaration whose type: speaks the full TypeExpr of 09-types.md (the flat 6-enum is dead · bool is the one boolean spelling) — validation + schema generation for callable workflows (see 01-envelope.md) ·

1nika: research-pipeline2​3inputs:4  topic:5    type: string6    required: true                   # the caller MUST supply it7    description: "Subject to research"8  paragraphs:9    type: integer10    default: 5                       # MUST conform to type: (checked · NIKA-DEFAULT-001)11​12tasks:13  research:14    ◇infer:15      prompt: "Research · ${{ inputs.topic }} · in ${{ inputs.paragraphs }} paragraphs"

A required: true input has no default: the caller must supply it at launch. To supply or override an input · nika run flow.nika.yaml --var topic="CEL subsets in 2026" (repeatable · engine CLI concern). A --var value overrides the declared default and satisfies a required: true input · an undeclared key is refused before the run. See 01-envelope.md for the launch contract.

Every bound input carries its ORIGIN (normative) · a value is not only what it is, it is where it came from, and the run records which ·

• Origin · The channel that supplied the value
• `cli-operator` · `--var name=value`, typed by a human at a terminal
• `ci-context` · `--var name=value` arriving through a pipeline — the caller is not a human
• `env` · `--var name=@env:VAR` · the **declared** environment channel, read through its explicit spelling
• `file` · the workflow's own declared `default:` filled the input

The origin is journaled at boot — it rides the prologue manifest (17 §the prologue) — and from there rises into the run's evidence pack, so a proof answers who supplied this and not merely what was supplied. (Measured 2026-08-13 · `nika 0.108.0`: `--var qui=…` at a terminal journals `inputs: {"qui":"cli-operator"}` and the pack reads `inputs.origins` with `source: "journal"`. The run RECEIPT — `receipt_format: 1`, whose folded shape is [15 §the one receipt](./15-proof.md) — does not carry origins; the claim belongs to the journal and the pack it feeds.) The distinction that carries the weight is env: an environment value enters through a spelling the author wrote, never through an ambient guess — the same law the `permits.env` passthrough enforces for child processes, applied to the launch surface. A pipeline and a person are likewise not the same caller, and a receipt that conflated them would lose the fact an auditor is looking for.

`${{ const.X }}` · named constants #

1const:2  retries: 3                                # bare literal3  output_dir: "./output"4  window:                                   # typed constant · value MUST conform to type:5    type: integer6    value: 307​8tasks:9  note:10    ◇infer:11      prompt: "Keep the ${{ const.retries }} retries in ${{ const.output_dir }}"

const holds the fixed values baked into the workflow: either a bare literal (any YAML value) or a typed constant { type, value } whose value: MUST conform to its type: (checked · NIKA-DEFAULT-001). An object carrying BOTH type and value keys is the typed form; an object missing either key is a bare literal object constant (the discriminator · so a literal like config: { type: "custom" } is never misread). Constants are immutable across the run and are never caller-supplied: a value the caller must be able to override is an inputs: declaration, not a constant.

`${{ with.X }}` · task-level scope #

Declared per-task · resolves at task dispatch time · the task's import surface ·

`with:` is the data boundary, not sugar. A ${{ tasks.X.* }} reference lives ONLY in with: (and the other boundary surfaces above): each such binding creates one typed edge, and the body consumes the binding by its local name. with: is where a task's inputs are visible at a glance — and where the graph gets its data edges (03 §with).

1summarize:2    with:3      content: ${{ tasks.research.output }}    # value edge · research → summarize4      style: "concise"                         # literal · no edge5    ◇infer:6      prompt: "Summarize in ${{ with.style }} style · ${{ with.content }}"

A binding whose evaluation errors settles the task failure — on_error: is NOT consulted (the boundary feeds the verb; the armor covers the verb · 03 §gate algebra).

`${{ tasks.X.output }}` · task record reference #

Reference an upstream task's output (or status · error · duration_ms) — at the boundary ·

1deploy:2    after: { test: success }                              # strict gate · no data from test3    with:4      coverage: ${{ tasks.test.output.coverage }}         # value edge · read the number5      artifact: ${{ tasks.build.output.artifact_path }}   # value edge · build → deploy6    when: ${{ with.coverage > 80 }}                       # local business condition7    ▷exec:8      command: ["./deploy.sh", "${{ with.artifact }}"]

tasks.X is the task result record: a CEL object, NOT the bare output value. Always write .output for the value · the record's fields are ·

1${{ tasks.X.output }}                the verb's output (string · object · or bytes · per verb · see 02)2${{ tasks.X.status }}                success | failure | skipped | cancelled  (closed enum · v1)3${{ tasks.X.error }}                 typed error record · present iff status == failure (see 05)4${{ tasks.X.started_at }}            RFC 3339 start timestamp5${{ tasks.X.ended_at }}              RFC 3339 end timestamp6${{ tasks.X.duration_ms }}           execution time · integer milliseconds7${{ tasks.X.<name> }}                a named extract: binding (jq · see below)

Defined-null reads (normative · the branch-join unlock) #

Reading a field of a task that reached a terminal state never errors: absent values are `null`, deterministically ·

1tasks.X.output   of a skipped task        → null   (incl. empty-collection for_each)2tasks.X.output   of a cancelled task      → null3tasks.X.error    when status != failure   → null   (EXCEPT on_error.skip · error stays · see 05)4tasks.X.<name>   bindings of a skipped/cancelled task → null

null is a CEL literal (with.x != null is in the v0.1 subset) and a JSON value (jq's select(. != null) filters it). This makes the diamond-join canonical · two exclusive when: branches + a join that takes whichever ran ·

1pick:2    with:                                     # value edges pass on skipped · the skipped one is null3      prod: ${{ tasks.build_prod.output }}4      dev: ${{ tasks.build_dev.output }}5    ◆invoke:6      tool: nika:jq7      args:8        input: [ "${{ with.prod }}", "${{ with.dev }}" ]9        expression: "[ .[] | select(. != null) ] | first"

One obvious way · no bare alias. ${{ tasks.X }} is the whole result object · the output is ALWAYS ${{ tasks.X.output }}: there is no tasks.X == output shortcut (it would make tasks.X both a scalar and a record · which CEL cannot type). This matches every workflow engine · GitHub Actions steps.X.outputs · Argo node context · Temporal result-vs-state · the task result is a record, never a scalar masquerading as the namespace.

Static binding validation against a declared `schema:` (normative) #

When the producing task declares a structured-output `schema:` (an infer: or agent: task · 02), the shape of tasks.X.output is KNOWN at parse time, so a reference path INTO that output (${{ tasks.X.output.entities }}) is statically checkable. The authoring contract ·

• An engine SHOULD validate tasks.X.output.<path> references against the declared schema at parse time (the misspelled-key class is caught before any model is called).
• An engine MUST reject invalid paths · NIKA-VAR-003 · variable_error. A path step is invalid when ·1. a **member step** lands on a schema level that **declares `properties:`** and does NOT list the key — declaring properties CLOSES the level for binding (operator lock 2026-07-30 · strict by default, one voice with the `returns:` walk below). The level opens back up ONLY explicitly: `additionalProperties: true` (or a schema object for extras) makes undeclared siblings legal again. (`additionalProperties: false` on a level with no `properties:` also closes it — the declared empty object.) 2. a **member step** lands on a level whose `type` excludes `object`; 3. an **index step** lands on a level whose `type` excludes `array`.
• The static walk covers the v0.1 subset `properties` · `items` · `type` · `additionalProperties` only. Any other construct at a level ($ref · oneOf / anyOf / allOf · patternProperties · a missing type · …) makes that level open: the walk stops and the engine MUST NOT reject anything beneath it.
• A level that declares no `properties:` at all (a bare type: object) is open: nothing is declared, so nothing can be contradicted — paths beneath it are never statically rejected.
• Tasks with NO declared schema (every exec: / invoke: task · an infer: without schema:) are dynamic: paths into their output are never statically rejected (a wrong path surfaces at run time as NIKA-VAR-001).

The balance is deliberate (2026-07-30 · supersedes the earlier "only additionalProperties: false closes" reading): where the author declared NOTHING, the check stays sound — open levels and dynamic producers are never refused. Where the author DECLARED the shape, the declaration is a contract — reading an undeclared sibling of declared keys is the misspelled-key class and refuses loudly, with a one-line fix either way (declare the key, or open the level with additionalProperties: true). Note the runtime nuance this owns: JSON Schema itself treats an absent additionalProperties as permissive at run time, and that runtime semantic is unchanged — the static BINDING law is stricter than the runtime validator on purpose (catching typos before any model is called is the point of declaring a schema).

`returns:` sharpens the walk (normative · [09-types.md](./09-types.md)). When the producer declares a returns: type instead of a raw schema:, the walk runs on the type with full precision: the v1 type grammar has no open construct, so every level is walkable — a member outside a closed object is NIKA-VAR-003 (the same code · one voice), and only additional: true or an Unknown producer opens a level. The raw schema: hatch keeps the weaker subset walk above.

`${{ secrets.X }}` · masked secret reference #

1⛨secrets:2  ⛨api_key:3    ⛨source: vault4    ⛨key: prod/anthropic/api-key5    ⛨egress: [{ to: "nika:fetch", host: "api.anthropic.com" }]6headers:7  Authorization: "Bearer ${{ secrets.api_key }}"

A secret is always a reference to a store (the local nika-vault by default), declared in the envelope secrets: block, never an inline literal. The engine masks every resolved secrets.X value in logs, traces, and journal events (it renders as ••••••). This inputs / secrets split is the modern secure-workflow default: non-sensitive values in inputs, masked references in secrets.

The masking boundary (normative). Masking covers the engine's OWN observability surface: logs · traces · journal · the nika:inspect output. It does NOT follow a secret value that the AUTHOR routes into a subprocess or tool that then re-emits it: a secrets.X put into exec.env (or a nika:fetch header) which the command echoes to stdout is captured verbatim into tasks.X.output and flows downstream like any other data: the engine cannot know that captured string IS the secret. The contract: the engine masks what IT prints; the author owns what they pipe a secret INTO. The nika check pre-flight flags every unsanctioned secrets.X flow into an effect (exec · invoke — and the provider-egress sinks infer / agent, where a secret in a prompt leaves the run to a third party), so the leak is caught statically before the run, not after. A legitimate flow is sanctioned where the secret is declared — the egress: list on the secret (the example above · full grammar in 01-envelope §egress): declassification is the owner's act, co-located with the data, never a property of the sink.

Extraction bindings · `extract:` #

Use extract: to define named bindings extracted from a task's raw response via a jq expression (the one data language). These bindings appear in the task's typed output and are referenced as ${{ tasks.X.<name> }} ·

1api_call:2    ◆invoke:3      tool: "nika:fetch"4      args:5        url: "https://api.example.com/v1/users"   # returns JSON · extract: jq extracts6    extract:7      user_count: ".data.users | length"8      first_user: ".data.users[0]"9      user_emails: "[.data.users[].email]"   # [...] collects the stream into an array

Downstream ·

1notify:2    with:3      user_count: ${{ tasks.api_call.user_count }}    # value edges · the bindings are the edges4      emails: ${{ tasks.api_call.user_emails }}5    ◇infer:6      prompt: |7        We have ${{ with.user_count }} users.8        Emails · ${{ with.emails }}

Raw output vs named bindings · dual-accessible #

When a task has an extract: block defining named bindings · downstream access is dual-accessible ·

1api_call:2    ◆invoke:3      tool: nika:fetch4      args: { url: "..." }5    extract:6      body: .body7      http_status: .status     # NOT `status:` — that name is reserved (the task's own .status)

Downstream (each form imported through a consumer's with: · the reference boundary) ·

1# Raw output (whole structure · pre-binding extraction)2${{ tasks.api_call.output }}             # full raw JSON · including all fields the verb returned3​4# Named bindings (defined in extract: block above) · value-role fields5${{ tasks.api_call.body }}               # jq .body  · the response body6${{ tasks.api_call.http_status }}        # jq .status · the HTTP status field7${{ tasks.api_call.status }}             # RESERVED · the task's own status (success|failure|…) · NOT a binding · terminal-observation role

Rules ·

• tasks.X.output ALWAYS returns the raw output (unmodified value returned by the verb · before any binding extraction)
• tasks.X.<name> for any <name> declared in extract: block returns the extracted jq result
• <name> collisions with reserved words output · status · error · started_at · ended_at · duration_ms are forbidden at parse time (NIKA-PARSE · validation_error: the rule is structural · schema-checkable via propertyNames · NIKA-VAR-NNN stays reserved for reference resolution and binding evaluation errors)
• If no extract: block · only tasks.X.output is accessible (named bindings are an opt-in convenience)

Path grammar · jq (the one data language) #

Output binding uses a jq expression: the SAME jq as the nika:jq builtin. Nika has ONE data extraction-and-transform language (jq), not two: the former RFC 9535 JSONPath was dropped because jq is a superset (any JSONPath query + more) and a workflow language must not force the author (or an LLM) to choose between two extraction syntaxes (SOTA « one obvious way · ≤2 expression layers »). The two expression layers are CEL (inside ${{ }} · conditions + value substitution) and jq (inside extract: bindings + nika:jq · extraction + transform). Reference engines use jaq (Rust jq) so paths behave identically everywhere.

v0.1 jq conformance subset (every engine MUST support) ·

1.<name>                    object member2.<name>[<index>]           array index3.<name>[]                  iterate all elements (jq `.[]` · was JSONPath `[*]`)4.a.b.c                     deep path5. | map(...) | select(...) jq pipeline for reshaping / filtering

The subset above is the portability floor every engine MUST support. Full jq (the jaq Rust impl · « full stdlib ») MAY be used minus what the next section refuses (D-2026-08-11-N26 · ambient reads and the wall clock): it is the single data extraction-and-transform language (extract: bindings + the nika:jq builtin). ⚠️ Full-minus-a-prose-list is a floor, not a ceiling. The ceiling is a named, versioned grammar — jq-subset/0.1, the sibling of `cel-subset/0.1` — which does not exist yet (D-2026-08-11-N31 creates it). Until it does, this sentence is the boundary, and a boundary written in prose is weaker than one written in EBNF.

Formal grammar · jq v0.1 subset (normative · grammar version `jq-subset/0.1`) #

Prose + examples are not re-implementable; this EBNF is. A conformant engine parses exactly this grammar in an extract: binding and in nika:jq (it is a strict subset of jq: any full jq parser accepts every expression below) ·

1program  = pipeline ;2pipeline = alt , { "|" , alt } ;3alt      = cmp , { "//" , cmp } ;             (* alternative · the // operator *)4cmp      = sum , [ cmpop , sum ] ;            (* at most ONE comparison · non-associative *)5cmpop    = "==" | "!=" | "<" | "<=" | ">" | ">=" ;6sum      = term , { ( "+" | "-" ) , term } ;7term     = unary , { ( "*" | "/" ) , unary } ;8unary    = [ "-" ] , postfix ;9postfix  = primary , { suffix } ;10suffix   = "." , IDENT11         | "[" , [ pipeline ] , "]"           (* index · [] iterates · NO slice in 0.1 *)12         | "?" ;                              (* optional · swallows the type error *)13reduce   = "reduce" , postfix , "as" , "$" , IDENT ,14           "(" , pipeline , ";" , pipeline , ")" ;   (* bounded fold · the stream IS the bound *)15format   = "@" , ( "base64" | "base64d" | "text" | "json" | "csv" | "tsv" | "uri" ) ;16primary  = "."                                (* identity *)17         | "." , IDENT18         | call | literal | object | array19         | reduce | format20         | "$" , IDENT21         | "(" , pipeline , ")" ;22call     = FUNC , [ "(" , pipeline , { ";" , pipeline } , ")" ] ;23object   = "{" , [ pair , { "," , pair } ] , "}" ;24pair     = ( IDENT | STRING ) , [ ":" , pipeline ] ;25array    = "[" , [ pipeline ] , "]" ;26literal  = NUMBER | STRING | "true" | "false" | "null" ;

FUNC is the closed set ·

1length · keys · values · has · type · not · empty · error2map · map_values · select · add · join · split · flatten · range3sort · sort_by · group_by · unique · unique_by · reverse4first · last · min · max · min_by · max_by · any · all5to_entries · from_entries · with_entries · del · paths6tostring · tonumber · tojson · fromjson · getpath · setpath · leaf_paths7ascii_downcase · ascii_upcase · ltrimstr · rtrimstr · startswith · endswith8floor · ceil · fabs

The set is deliberately small, and small is the safe direction: a minor version may only ADD (same law as cel-subset/0.1), so a name omitted here costs one amendment while a name admitted early can never be withdrawn.

⚠️ The first cut of this grammar refused four of THIS SPEC'S OWN canonical recipes (2026-08-11 · corrected the same day). It had been verified against the 41 programs the corpus uses and never against the recipes stdlib §what jq subsumes recommends — reduce, the @base64 formats, and the getpath/setpath/leaf_paths family, which the cut-builtin table publishes as the supported way to do the work those builtins used to do. A corpus of USE and a corpus of RECOMMENDATION are two different subjects, and a grammar that refuses its own documentation would have made the spec self-contradictory the day it shipped. reduce is admitted with its stream as the bound — it folds over a finite stream and cannot recurse, so it terminates by construction and does not reopen what the table below refuses. Both corpora now pass: 40/40 programs, 9/9 recipes. Derived from the corpus, not invented: over 41 programs in the shipped and internal corpora, the functions actually used are map · sort · last · fromjson · join · length, plus paths, the pipe, object/array construction and arithmetic. Everything above is that set plus its obvious companions.

Measured on 0.108.0, 2026-08-11. The engine embeds a full jaq and the subset below is not enforced. A workflow whose only task is ·…passes check with rc=0. So do sub · gsub · scan · now · strftime. The single production actually refused is $ENV, and it is refused by jaq's own compiler, not by any gate of ours.Amended 2026-08-15 · ONE row of that list moved. env — the FUNCTION, not the $ENV variable — is now refused by a gate of ours (D-2026-08-11-N26 · withheld from the function set the compiler receives, at all three jq seams, with a diagnostic naming the class it reached for). The rest of the paragraph stands unchanged: sub · gsub · scan · now · strftime still pass, this table still does not fire, and « the grammar is written, the gate is owed » is still the honest sentence for jq-subset/0.1. now in particular is NOT closed by that gesture — D-2026-08-11-N27 owns the clock and prescribes a rebinding to the run's start instant, which is a different remedy from a subtraction.Saying so here is not a footnote: a spec that asserts a refusal the engine does not make teaches a boundary that is not there. Two rows of this table are security-adjacent (now is the ambient clock that N27 forbids; the regex family is the data-dependent blowup the ceiling exists to bound) — and a reader who trusts the table would believe both are already closed.The table stands as the specification of the gate, unchanged. What changes is its status: it describes what jq-subset/0.1 MUST refuse when the gate ships, not what 0.108.0 refuses today. Until then the honest sentence is « the grammar is written, the gate is owed ».

What the grammar refuses BY CONSTRUCTION, and why ·

• Absent · Why
• `recurse` · `..` · `while` · `until` · `repeat` · non-termination · a binding must be decidable at check
• `def` · user-defined recursion re-introduces the same
• `env` · `$ENV` · `input` · `inputs` · `input_filename` · ambient reads · the law above
• `debug` · `stderr` · writes outside the value
• `now` · `localtime` · `gmtime` · `mktime` · `strftime` · the clock · an input, never an ambient (N27)
• `halt` · `halt_error` · process control · a data expression does not end a run
• `test` · `match` · `sub` · `gsub` · `splits` · `scan` · regex · data-dependent blowup · deferred to a minor that pairs them with a bounded engine, not banned on principle
• slices `.[a:b]` · omitted for 0.1 only · a minor may add

⚠️ A grammar bounds the SHAPE, never the MAGNITUDE. [range(1e9)] parses clean and still materialises a billion elements. That is the runtime step budget's job (D-2026-08-11-N32), and the two ceilings are not interchangeable: the static one buys termination, the runtime one buys size. Neither alone is enough.

An expression sees only its input (normative · D-2026-08-11-N26) #

The world of a data expression is the value it is given, and nothing else. Not the process, not the clock, not the disk, not the environment. The control expressions of 03 §CEL obey the same law: their world is the bindings they are given.

This is what makes the surrounding closure real. A data expression cannot name a host, a path, a program or a tool — those are literal in permits:. It cannot decide whether a task runs — that is CEL, and CEL is non-Turing. It carries no effect of its own. What remains is a transformation from a value to a value, and that is the whole of its power. The language is not closed because it forbids expression; it is closed because an expression cannot reach anything.

Two consequences, both normative:

• Ambient reads are refused. A program that reads the process environment (env, $ENV), the input filename, or the standard input reaches outside its value. ⚠️ Measured 2026-08-11 on a shipped engine: `env.NAME` returned the ambient value under an absent `permits:` block and again under an explicit empty `permits.env`, while the static check reported the body as pure compute from which nothing escapes. The reach is bounded — such a program is a literal in the reviewed file and cannot be interpolated from a model's output (NIKA-VAR-005) — but a computation that reads the ambient environment is not pure, and the certificate said it was. ✅ ENFORCED since 2026-08-15. Re-measured that day on the three authority shapes: env.NAME is refused at nika check with NIKA-VAR-005 under an absent permits: block, under an explicit empty permits.env, AND under a granted permits.env — a grant does not turn it back on, because permits.env passes an environment to a process the workflow SPAWNS and an in-process expression is not that process. The mechanism is the subtraction itself: env is withheld from the function set every jq seam hands the compiler, so the refusal belongs to the compiler rather than to a scanner, and the three seams (the nika:jq builtin · extract: bindings · the static compile-check) read ONE list. $ENV was already refused by jaq's own compiler and still is. ⏳ The clock half of this bullet is still owed — see the next bullet: now reads the wall clock today, and D-2026-08-11-N27 prescribes a REBINDING rather than this subtraction.
• The clock is an input, never an ambient (D-2026-08-11-N27). now and its relatives MUST resolve to the run's start instant, which is already in the trace, so that a replay yields the same value forever. Reading the wall clock would make the same file pass on a fast machine and fail on a slow one — the property a replay exists to deny. A long task therefore sees the START instant, not its own; that is the price of determinism and it is the correct one.

Why the layer is not simply removed. The need to reshape a value does not disappear with it: an author denied this layer reaches for exec: and a real subprocess, which is strictly worse. The bounded expression layer is what prevents the escape to the shell. Subtracting without replacing moves the hole; it does not close it.

Binding rules (single-value · pure-jq) #

• A binding resolves to exactly ONE value. A jq program emits a stream: .users[] yields N separate values, NOT an array. A binding whose program emits zero or multiple values is an evaluation-time error (NIKA-VAR-002 · the emission count is data-dependent · undecidable at parse). The reference linter additionally WARNS at check time (one-obvious-way/009) on the statically-visible smell (a binding jq ending in a trailing iterator [] with no collecting [ … ] wrapper). A jq program that itself errors at runtime is NIKA-VAR-004. Collect a stream with [ … ] ([.users[].email] → array) · take one with an index (.users[0]) or first(…). One obvious way · no silent first-match, no implicit array-wrap.

`extract:` or `nika:jq` · the choice, decided (normative for linters · 2026-08-11) #

• Rule · Instead of · Write
• `one-obvious-way/013` · `invoke: {tool: nika:jq}` reshaping **one** producer's output · an `extract:` binding on that producer

They are the same jq over the same value, and until now nothing said which to reach for — the only genuine unguarded overlap left in the language. The rule follows from what each one IS, not from taste ·

• An extract: binding is boundary work: it costs no task, no wave and no node in the graph, it runs per iteration inside a for_each, and it carries a normative cardinality law (exactly one value · NIKA-VAR-002).
• nika:jq is a task: it has an id, a place in the DAG, its own gate and its own timeout — and it can read several producers through with:, which a binding structurally cannot, since a binding sees only the output it hangs from.

⇒ One producer, reshaped: a binding. Two or more, joined: the builtin. The builtin stays because the many-input case is real and inexpressible otherwise; the binding wins the single-input case because a whole task node to rename a field is a node the graph did not need.

• An `extract:` jq expression is pure jq over the task's raw output: it does NOT contain ${{ }} (the two expression layers never nest in one string · CEL reads the namespaces · jq reads the task output). To parametrize an extraction by a workflow value, shape the verb's input with ${{ }} · the jq then runs over the result. (Exposing the read namespaces as jq variables, .items[] | select(.id == $inputs.target), is a v0.2 candidate · jq-native · additive · NOT in the v0.1 subset.)

Resolution order #

When a task is admitted · the engine resolves ${{ ... }} references in this order ·

1. Boundary first · the with: bindings materialize (their tasks.X.field references read the settled records — this is where the data edges deliver)
2. `when:` evaluates over the local namespaces (inputs · const · with · loop locals)
3. Body · verb-field expressions resolve (inputs.X · const.X · secrets.X · with.X · loop locals — never tasks.*)
4. Single-pass · a substitution result is NOT re-evaluated (no nested substitution)

If a reference is unresolved · the engine raises a NIKA-VAR-001 (undefined variable) error — at the boundary (steps 1-2) it settles the task failure with on_error: NOT consulted; in the body (step 3) it is task-stage work, recoverable by on_error: (03 §task states).

Value rendering · object → string #

When a ${{ }} reference resolves to an object or array and is substituted into a string position (e.g. inside a prompt: or command:), it renders as compact JSON · deterministic (object keys sorted · no insignificant whitespace). Scalars render as their natural string (numbers · booleans · null → null). There are no template pipe-filters (${{ x | json }} is NOT a thing · per the §locked substitution surface). To control the rendering, extract a string with jq in extract: (@json for JSON text · tostring / @text for scalar coercion) and reference that binding. One obvious way · implicit compact-JSON by default · explicit jq when you need a specific shape.

A bytes output (tool-determined · e.g. MCP image content · a binary nika:read) is opaque · it flows tool→tool by reference (a with: binding of ${{ tasks.fetch_img.output }} → another tool's content: arg · or a file path for infer.vision). Bytes cannot be jq-extracted (jq is JSON-only) nor substituted into a string position: that is an error (NIKA-VAR-007) · the engine never silently UTF-8-coerces a blob (it would corrupt the data). For nika:fetch and exec (no binary value channel · the 9 fetch modes are text/JSON · raw is text), binary is file-mediated · write to a path, then read or reference the path. There is no output_format field · the value carries its own type.

Escaping #

To embed a literal ${{ in a string · use \${{ (backslash escape). The engine MUST honor this.

1◇infer:2  prompt: "The syntax \\${{ inputs.x }} is how you reference variables."

(Note · YAML escaping of backslash · \\ in double-quoted strings · \ in single-quoted or block scalars.)

Backslash runs (normative) · the escape counts the CONTIGUOUS backslash run immediately before ${{ · an odd run escapes the opener (the island is literal text; the escaping backslash is consumed) · an even run (including zero) leaves the island live. Within that run, each remaining backslash PAIR renders as one literal backslash; backslashes anywhere else are ordinary characters (there is no general backslash processing). So \${{ x }} renders the literal ${{ x }} · \\${{ x }} renders one \ followed by the RESOLVED island · \\\${{ x }} renders one \ + the literal ${{ x }}.

An unclosed `${{` (an unescaped opener with no closing }}) is rejected at parse time · NIKA-VAR-008 · validation_error: the substitution surface belongs to this section, even though the YAML itself parses fine.

Why one syntax everywhere #

An earlier draft proposed two syntaxes ($task_id in value positions · {{var}} inside strings). That was a confusion source · v0.1 unifies on a single ${{ }} syntax for everything.

Reasons ·

• One mental model · same syntax everywhere · low cognitive load (Rams principle 4 understandable)
• GitHub Actions familiarity · 30M+ developers already know ${{ ... }}
• Composable in any position · strings · object values · array elements · conditions
• Unique enough · escape rarely needed
• Future-proof · GitHub Actions has extended this syntax for 8+ years without breaking change

Forward-compat #

The ${{ ... }} substitution surface and the 5 namespaces are locked at v1. Template pipe-filters (`${{ inputs.x | json }}` · `| upper`) are NOT a growth path (they would duplicate builtins + push CEL toward a string-DSL). Data transforms live in the nika:jq builtin; the ${{ }} surface grows only with CEL-native features: the conditional ?:, the has() presence macro, and the contains/startsWith/endsWith string tests ship in cel-subset/0.1 (03 §grammar); all/exists and matches() regex stay reserved for a later additive minor. jq is the single extraction-and-transform language (extract: + nika:jq).

Out of scope for v0.1 (deferred · see `08-out-of-scope.md`) ·

• Expression language (no arithmetic in templates)
• User-defined functions in templates
• Multi-pass substitution

🦋 Next · [05 · Errors](./05-errors.md)